IUBio

Brian Capacity

Laim laim at globalnet.co.uk
Sun May 23 22:24:51 EST 1999


Cheers Ken,
Has anyone recently tested his jelly for the 100's of
neuro-transmitters that have revealed themselves recently?
>when Einstein's brain was examined post mortem, it was found that
>was more-densely populated than "normal" with neuralglia cells.
Sorry I was following you up to <"normal" with>,
what does the rest mean in dim-wit terms?
>ken collins
>
>[P. S. i believe the material is still in a jar somewhere. kpc]
Anyways,
what's so clever about him ?
even I know e=m*(c(squared))
diviided by the square root of 1-something that is usually ziltch.
(see i can be technical too :) )
Cheers
Liam, doh

>
>Laim wrote:
>> 
>> Ok a question from a dim-wit.
>> People like artists use different parts of their brains than
>> non-artists ( ie the emotive parts).
>> Do geniuses use any different section of their brain than the rest of
>> us? or are more sections stimulated at once?
>> Do they have any differences in their DNA? in regards the junk (?)
>> DNA?
>> I think the structural differences between a genius and normal are
>> slight, but at post-mortem did thay have any more of certain
>> neuro-transmitters?
>> Before I get flamed, don't bother coz I won't understand it OK.
>> Cheers
>> Liam
>> 
>> On Fri, 21 May 1999 17:35:53 -0000, "Simon Marsh"
>> <simonmarsh at tardis99.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> >Some neuroscientests estimate that during an average lifespan, a person uses
>> >only 1/100 of 1% (.0001) of his potentional brain capacity. - Why do we
>> >have a brain with so much capacity that we hardly test a fraction of it in a
>> >normal life time?
>> >
>> >
>> >




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net