> the idea of independent thinking
>capabilities in one part of the brain does seem absolutely silly from a
>neurophysiologist point of view.
I notice that you obviously never bothered to read and follow what I
wrote.
If you had followed what I write about me and the sequencer you would
have noticed that both of us thinkers are of several parts, and that
both of us are using parts in the frontal cortex for more parallel
tracking power and other stuff that gives our thinking more
capacities.
I criticized that author for not either describing all areas alike or
going from the own I. This permanent thinking myself two places
forwards to there, just that I cannot dock to perceive from there the
way that would be needed to get that without optical imagining,
sucks.There are those of us having handicapped optical imagining
abilities. Though some brainsurfers actually seem to have managed to
dock into the playground to perceive from there I never heard of
anyone managing for frontal cortex so far.
The criticism was more that he seemed to follow some classic belief of
neuros that humans have a big frontal cortex, therefore it would be a
neat "justification" why to imprison, abuse and eat other mammals,
therefore for this "justification" in the belief it is easier to stick
it there than to find a reason if we are where self-perceivers say we
are and are some of the parts of the in Alzheimer damaged areas in the
cholinergic limbic system why some of the stuff described in this book
done to other mammals is morally correct, and if it is not correct,
than I doubt he would have had the ease with which he described it.
It used to be fashion among several neuros to make their belief first
for the front to be the own center, then when they finally seemed to
get it, too, that you might park brick and cut out a tumour quite some
size there and the I still there, came up belief systems like bigger
nets and so on.
Anything but that there are several consciousnesses and that own I is
in the cholinergic limbic system.
I rate the crimes of neuros against persons are some of the worst the
crimes of humanity, and there is not interest in neuro to admit that
it are persons they are keeping imprisoned and abuse there, because in
so much they are so likely alike us.
I just warned to be careful with classic neuro,
that ususally in their theories there are often attempts at
justifications why what is done to others is O.K. because we are the
Master Race and all others non-persons of inferior races THAT are all
just animals.
There is no admitting to that all mammals and birds and some others
are WHOs and are persons, there is no admitting to that our I is in
the cholinergic limbic system,
and therefore when reading it I advise to be very careful with books
where theories and facts are both in there, to basically junk most of
the theories and just pay attention to the facts.
For theories I like MBD brainsurfers and for one area of the brain LSD
folks, for energy advanced practicers of magic perception & telepathy
and some into the arts of dreaming and dreamsharing and astral travel,
for physical detail data neurology, for Earth energies interreactions
with humans the (?) Rutengaenger, and for forms of hallucinating
practicers of magic perception who can shift between hallucinating,
more common ranges and transcending ranges, etc.
If taking the data if a branch where the theories are reknown for
errors, it might be wise to stay aware of some of the classic data
errors, and maybe to understand a little of a belief system behind and
what it is good for.
This way when reading the stuff with some of the theories it then can
be understood easier that maybe the person is sense censored and needs
some justification why doing gross stuff to other mammals, and when
making theories is needing to warp stuff to fit some inner belief tht
allows to turn persons of other races into things and possessions and
oneself into the master race, so that it is O.K. to imprison, maim and
kill the other, because due to this belief he or she is just some
desexualized depersonalized possession serving to give the own master
race more data for the own advantage or curiosity.
