IUBio

it's interesting

ken collins kenpc at banet.net
Sun May 9 21:51:08 EST 1999


ken collins wrote:
> 
> i've recently spent some "time" in alt.psychology.nlp... i
> presume that the discussion is still there... it went much the
> same as it always goes in any online forum, only the "weirdness"
> was more-greatly magnified than any i've experienced elsewhere.

btw, i presumed, on going there, tht this was yet another
"setup"... like the other cross-posted "discussions" that've
appeared here in bionet.neuroscience... recently there was
sci.lang, last "time" i was on the internet, there was
alt.religion.gnostic... then there were the discussions of
"mind-control" via EM, and perhaps benevolent(?) crosposts to
alt.brain and alt.human.brain... i learned long ago that, when i
follow such "leads", there's always soething useful that can be
done... in alt.psychology.nlp, i "documented" some things that
were also the subject of former, awesomely-censored (i described
such in a msg posted here in bionet.neuroscience just before i
gave up my net account last January), discussions that were
posted in sci.physics.electromag last January... the latest
"documentation" was both a backward and forward reference to how
what's described by 2nd Thermo constitutes an absolute frame of
reference... the sci.physics.electromag msgs were a discussion of
how this absolute frame can be read directly (this same
discussion has been reprised, "encoded", repeatedly in various
online "places", including in alt.religion.gnostic :-)

[...]

> and i'm left wondering if my genetic stuff materialized at the wrong > coordinates of the Universe.

but i watched a couple of Frank Capra flicks today, and was
reminded that at least one other person saw things the way i
do... _Mr. Deeds Goes to Town_, which is a funny take on my own
experience... and _Mr. Smith Goes to Washington_, which is an
unfunny take on the Same-Stuff. I was going to make it a
"triple-feature", by watching _It's a Wonderful Life_, but
decided that it'd just be "two" sad this night. Whenever i watch
Capra's work, i'm left "wonderin'" why it is that folks in
Hollywood, these days, seem to have such "difficulty" making
movies that folks'll enjoy... but it struck me, today, that folks
"move away from" portrayals like Capras because they're "afraid"
of the "flack" they'd receive from all the commonplace criminals
in high-places who'd presume that the Capra-like portrayals were
"exposing" their predatory behavior... a glimpse into such is in
the _Mr. Smith..._ movie... the Jean Arthur characer, Clarissa,
is musing about how she wished she wasn't "so smart", or
something like that, refering to all of the "back-room" hypocrisy
that's widely considered to constitute "intelligence"... you
know, "take advantage of the 'suckers'" "walk away with their
money", etc., and consider that to be an indication of
"intelligence" having been manifested...  it dawned on me that
there's come to be a tacit "taboo" against doing Capra-like
movies, which unabashedly promote moral values, because it's be
"hitting 'two' close to home"... you know, "can't offend
so-and-so [big-wig associate] by doing a movie that looks so much
like the "life" he/she actually lives, and then expect to be
invited on the party circuit"...

...it's sadly-hilarious... there it is... in its considered
absence, a Confession.

...so, "two", with the considered absence of any publication of
the understanding... only, one can't find even a scap of "humor"
in the latter absence, can one?

no... not with folks Choosing Savagery.

K. P. Collins



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net