In bionet.neuroscience Bloxy's <Bloxy's at hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <7g6alh$ssl$1 at oravannahka.Helsinki.FI>, dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
> >In bionet.neuroscience Cijadrachon <cijadra at zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> >> One of the few things I value at times about people liking science is
> >> the precision of facts,
> Pure horse shit.
...
...[outburst by Bloxy]
> >The profession thanks you. Sincerely.
> Huh?
> And who are you, mr. dead donkey ass sucker?
> What authority do you have to speak for entire profession?
First, a person who writes like you did cannot obviously be of the profession.
The obvious juvenile verbal imbalance is only part of the evidence.
As to myself, I serve as Professor of Physiology, teach mainly
neuroscience to medical students, have a research group doing sleep research,
which in this case is a branch of neuroscience, focussing on
neurochemical and neurphysiological changes during sleep loss and recovery.
Also, unlike yourself, several persons in this newsgroup are aware of
my connection with science, including both neuroscientists and
some other intelligent discussants. The long-standing activist in this
group, Cijadrachon, is often of wildly different opinion from the
neuroscientists, but some of her opinions about people and the world can be
recognized as being on a sound basis even by us "scientists". As I see
it, scientists strive towards precision in the description of observable
events, precision in the conducting of experiments, precision in the
drawing of conclusions. That the findings are inexact and may be revised
as more facts emerge is a part of the game.
Dag Stenberg