>and how language developed.
What does it say about that?
For the unlikely chance that any brainsurfers/psychedilic users
with cingulate access are around:
When switching to where tones forwards up above the own areas go to
"colour structure", any historic origin time estimates?
You believe it is to do with language development later, too, or not,
and that is just to do with tones differentiating off the rest or
something like that?
When "switching the front to transcending" and comparing that to just
other neocortex structures being tuned a lot to transcending ranges
but the front not yet, and comparing the results to embryos
development, is there a time where you'd guess a certain congruence?
Time estimate of where the front went off the rest for perception?
When observing "action config change" for front transcending
perception, anyone having enough subperception to know if the language
structurer goes off new function first or if the off-lining is going
together with alterations of several systems for older function
settings?
Also e-mail REs welcome.
>Apparently, there have been many stages of intelligence over the 3-billion-year-long
>history of life: reflex,
Why is reflex rated as intelligence?
What is intelligend about when I sit
and someone taps some spot at my knee
and the lower leg goes up?
>The role of "delay" is very important for human decision
>and free-will.
IMO delay is to do with mine and the sequencer's thinking capacities,
and it is no chance that our systems are of several systems nor is it
chance that we are using the front for more parallel tracks and other
stuff, also I guess to do with delay.
But me and the sequencer are not the only ones to decide stuff, and a
couple of the systems that to me are not seeming intelligent are
giga-deciders in the brain.
And concerning free will, if one of them wants something and I do not
find it logical and override, then it might be my free will to do
that, but if I that way see to negative balances and then many systems
do not feel well, what do I have of that? So much for free will.
>I got my copy of
>"The Bible According to Einstein" at Amazon.com at a nice discount,
>but BarnesandNoble.com also offers $10 off the price.
>>--James
(If I were more suspicious I'd wonder more seriously if friends of an
author or to do with a company go through rooms and advertise for
their stuff.)