BTW, if folks think my RETRACTION-REACTION was 'selfish', i =long-ago=
pleaded with folks to just communicate NDT's stuff, citing 'Mr. X' as the
author, or to allow me to teach NDT's stuff to someone else, and allow that
person to publish it.
the only caveat was that the theory's stuff had to address all the
applications of the understanding to folks' suffering.
i've also been trying, since long ago, to win an opportunity to quietly
present the theory's stuff to any small group of folks in Neuroscience who
would agree to hear it, with the promise that i'd just 'go away' if they'd
bring the understanding forward.
the intensity of my RETRACTION-REACTION stems from the fact that either
folks've plagerized the work i've done =without= any indication of intent to
carry the work to those who suffer-greatly, or there's some cruel 'hoax'
going on.
i'll stand for neither.
K. P. COLLINS (ken)
Ken Collins wrote in message ...
>John, if i've witlessly, or in any other way needlessly, maligned you, i
>Apologize.
>>i've been witnessing the same for most of the past decade, and the stuffs
of
>the refs you've been posting cut right to the heart.
>>the thing is, i've no way of differentiating between the possibilities that
>they are 'just' mean-spirited hoaxes, or outright plagerism... (if i chased
>after everything that's out-there, it'd consume my small abilities to just
>do the work i'm doing.
>>if your intent is Honorable, i Thank You, with all the ability that i've
>left to express Gratitude.
>>K. P. COLLINS
>>John wrote in message <933154316.856159 at server.australia.net.au>...
>>http://news2.thls.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_366000/366102.stm>>>>"Most of the stroke patients in the study made better progress when using
>>the mirror therapy than when performing the same exercises with a sheet of
>>clear plastic.
>>>>The researchers, who publish their findings in The Lancet medical journal,
>>followed the progress of nine patients with hemiparesis. "
>>>>>>>>>>
