IUBio

It's primitive; it's dumb (PLAUSIBLE definitions?)

Steve rstevew at armory.com
Tue Jul 27 23:23:39 EST 1999


Jim Balter wrote:
> 
> rawcswi at my-deja.com wrote:
> 
> > However, you can hardly expect both to be rude to someone in a
> > private communication and to have them show you the courtesy of
> > protecting the privacy of your communication.
> 
> Yes, I most certainly can expect that, from people with any regard
> for the rule against making private communications public.
> Of course some morally corrupt persons find all sorts of
> justifications for their corruption, such as "oh, that rule doesn't
> apply if the person was rude".
> <J Q B>
----------------------------------
There's no such "rule". It originated in a file written in ten minutes
by a sysadmin of the old DarpaNet to request that people stop flaming
each other. It's merely a recommendation, not a rule of any kind. No
ISP's defend it and they will tell you there is no such obligation.
Mail sent by USPS to a person becomes their property in its entirety,
though not their copyright. The sender owns the copyrights, but the
reciepient owns the right to distribute the information given him
any way he wishes.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz  rstevew at armory.com  ftp://ftp.armory.com:/pub/user/rstevew
-Electronics Site!! 1000 Files/50 Dirs!! http://www.armory.com/~rstevew
Europe Naples Italy: http://ftp.unina.it/pub/electronics/ftp.armory.com



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net