just sense the wdb2t gradient, and 'go the other way'.
the only 'difficulty' is that folks 'deceive' each other by doing work to
create artificial gradients within the one wdb2t gradient. this 'difficulty'
isn't insurmountable, however. an organism need only range widely enough to
detect departures from the one 'map' that is wdb2t.
it's quite awesomely-beautiful and capable.
K. P. Collins
Ken Collins wrote in message ...
>this means that mutually-exclusive functionalities, such as antagonistic
>musculature, must be mapped in a topologically mirror-image way... one
>'side' gets activated, the other deactivated... all in accord with one
>global topology that's got point-to-point correspondence with
>directionalities within the external environment in which an organism
>exists.
>>superficially, there seems to be a lot of easily-seen evidence which
>'contradicts' all this, but when 2nd, 3rd, etc. functional relationships
are
>accounted for, all that results is the one topological 'map', and maximized
>efficiency within the neural topology that it constitutes.
>>over the long-term, TD E/I-minimization directs the host organism to
'climb'
>the energy-flow gradient that is the one-way flow of energy from order to
>disorder that is what's described by 2nd Thermo (wdb2t). because of this,
TD
>E/I-minimization automatically by-produces behaviors that enhance
organisms'
>prospects for discovering 'food' [energy augmentation]... which is 'just'
>the opposite of wdb2t, which constitutes a 'climbing' of the wdb2t
gradient.
>>evolutionary dynamics hit on the TD E/I-minimization neural
>information-processing strategy be-cause wdb2t permeates all of physical
>reality. since it's so, wdb2t constitutes an unerring 'map' of Truth that
>our nervous systems innately follow... via simple TD E/I-minimization.
>>cheers, K. P. Collins
>>Ken Collins wrote in message ...
>>Hi, Didier.
>>>>Didier A. Depireux wrote in message <7nke90$edk$1 at hecate.umd.edu>...
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>Without going through AoK (the reprint pile on my desk is already big
>>>enough as it is), would you mind stating what TD stands for? E/I is
>>>usually (in hearing, anyway) an abbreviation for Excitatory/Inhibitory.
>>>>>> Didier
>>>>there's a lot in-it, but it's short-hand for "the sum of the
>>Topologigally-Distributed relative ratios of Excitation to Inhibition"...
>>the "TD" includes all of Neuroanatomy's twists and turns, which all exist
>>for the sole purpose of aligning all of the neural architecture so that
>>'decisions' can be made, within it, through the simple minimization of
>=one=
>>'thing'...
>>>>TD E/I.
>>>>neural activation 'states' are 'finitized' [rendered maximally-finite]
when
>>excitation is minimized and inhibition is maximized. our nervous systems
do
>>everything that they do by 'seeking' this one 'goal'.
>>>>[there's more to it. for instance, there's neural architecture that's
>>inherently TD E/I(up)-generating... but all such seemingly-discordant
>>instances are just more of the tightly-integrated global neural
>architecture
>>that 'seeks' to do only one thing: minimize TD E/I.]
>>>>ken collins
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>
