I RETRACT THIS EARLIER POST OF MINE... i'll explain elsewhere.
K. P. Collins
Ken Collins wrote in message ...
>Hi, Didier.
>>Didier A. Depireux wrote in message <7nke90$edk$1 at hecate.umd.edu>...
>>>[...]
>>>Without going through AoK (the reprint pile on my desk is already big
>>enough as it is), would you mind stating what TD stands for? E/I is
>>usually (in hearing, anyway) an abbreviation for Excitatory/Inhibitory.
>>>> Didier
>>there's a lot in-it, but it's short-hand for "the sum of the
>Topologigally-Distributed relative ratios of Excitation to Inhibition"...
>the "TD" includes all of Neuroanatomy's twists and turns, which all exist
>for the sole purpose of aligning all of the neural architecture so that
>'decisions' can be made, within it, through the simple minimization of
=one=
>'thing'...
>>TD E/I.
>>neural activation 'states' are 'finitized' [rendered maximally-finite] when
>excitation is minimized and inhibition is maximized. our nervous systems do
>everything that they do by 'seeking' this one 'goal'.
>>[there's more to it. for instance, there's neural architecture that's
>inherently TD E/I(up)-generating... but all such seemingly-discordant
>instances are just more of the tightly-integrated global neural
architecture
>that 'seeks' to do only one thing: minimize TD E/I.]
>>ken collins
>>>[...]
>>
