Ken Collins wrote in message ...
>Malcolm McMahon wrote in message <379d5d33.13532628 at news.demon.co.uk>...
>>>[...]
>>>The test, of course, is Popper refutability. If a scientific theory is,
>>in fact, wrong then it ought to be possible, at least in principal, to
>>disprove it. If you make some technological device based on a falacious
>>theory odds are it won't work.
>>>>This is invariably not the case with religious theories
>>>[...]
>>i'll gladly accept, in-person, before fair witnesses, any challenge with
>respect to the claims i've made with respect to the Teaching of Jesus.
>>Neuroscience provides the verification.
and, on that day, the Q that'll need to be addressed will be, "How can it be
that Jesus could've been so, verifiably, awesomely-Knowledgeable about our
'human natures', 2000 years ago, long before the Scientific Method was ever
a glimmer in folks' minds?"
my answer is, as Jesus Explained, but few Believed, 2000 years ago, or
since, "God".
K. P. Collins (ken)
>[...]
