the 'spatial' correlation, re. hippocampal function, had been proposed by
others before i developed the 'supersystem configuration' stuff.
it's just that the 'spatial' functionality =derives= in the 'supersystem
configuration' stuff... despite the fact that folks can design experiments
that are 'spatially' vigilant, there exists no explicitly-'spatial' stuff at
any 'level' lower than the nervous system as a =whole=.
a somewhat-easier analogue of the hippocampal case, and which is also
discussed in AoK, is the formerly-widely-held, erroneous, notion that the
cerebellum is 'exclusively-motor'.
it's not.
as is briefly explained in AoK (i never dreamed that folks'd grant me no
opportunity to write the full account before subjecting me to their
'inquisition', such as is going on here in bionet.neuroscience, even now)
the cerebellum is another awesomely-capable 'supersystem configuration'
mechanism.
that's all it is. it doesn't even know 'motor' from 'sensory'. all it
'knows' is TD E/I-minimization. the topological-distributed-ness takes care
of everything that needs to be taken care of, in the way of 'spatial' stuff,
'motor' stuff, 'sensory' stuff, =all= other stuff... =within= 'supersystem
configuration' dynamics.
yeah, it's a lot.
but instead of granting me the opportunity, long begged-for by me, to
explain further, folks just took my work, plagerized hell out of it, created
some personal nomenclature, and published, where i was not allowed to
publish.
...in other words, they shot Science in the heart, and left it there, on the
floor of their dreams-sans-ethics, to Die.
do you catch the drift of my Sorrow?
it's on behalf of Science... i don't care about the Jackasses, or what
they've done with respect to themselves... i Guard Free Will...
...but, lo! Science has been Murdered by these Jackasses... and i =do= care
with respect to such.
K. P. Collins
Sturla Molden wrote in message <379c5bba.443619 at newscache.ntnu.no>...
>On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 00:47:38 -0400, "Ken Collins"
>>i did see a correlation to 'memory' via system 'configuration' because
>>memory acquisition is dependent upon 'orienting' behavior, but i'd no
>>evidence that "fimbria/fornix lesion acts as a functional hippocampus"
>>lesion.
>>Wishaw, IQ and Jarrard, LE (1995) Similarities vs differences in place
>learning and circadian activity in rats after fimbria-fornix section
>or ibotenate removal of hippocampal cells. Hippocampus, 5, 595-604.
>>Cassel, JC et al (1998) Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal
>lesions in rats: Effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning
>and memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 69, 22-45.
>>>>>Sturla Molden
>>
