F. Frank LeFever wrote in message <7n68dm$ikl at dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>...
>In <##8wRl$0#GA.264 at cpmsnbbsa02> "Ken Collins" <KPaulC at email.msn.com>
>writes:
>>>>>>F. Frank LeFever wrote in message
><7n60do$20v at dfw-ixnews16.ix.netcom.com>...
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>Let's see if I grasp this metaphore: "The Beast" = complete ignorance
>>>about brain function?
>>>>No. folks can comprehend a lot of Neuroscience, yet not understand how
>our
>>brains function in a way that "attracts" their functioning to that
>which,
>>through experience, has become merely-familiar.
>>>>because folks don't comprehend this stuff, folks murder one another,
>>>HAVE YOU DONE YOUR DUTY AS A CITIZEN AND NOTIFIED THE LOCAL AND
>NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT PEOPLE MURDER ONE ANOTHER
>BECAUSE THEY DO NOT (FULLY) UNDERSTAND BRAIN FUNCTION?
i've done my best to communicate the understanding in every way i could, to
everyone on the face of the planet.
>Actually, on re-reading it a few times, I'm not sure I understand that
>sentence. "not understand how our brains function in a way that
>'attracts' their functioning to that which, through experience, has
>become merely-familiar"?? HUH?
i'm beginning to doubt that i could communicate the understanding to you
in-person, Frank. the statements are clear enough.
>"Attracts their functioning"?? Our brains attract "their" (whose?)
>functioning?? Attracts it "to that which, through experience, has
>become merely-familiar"?? HUH?
the Abstract of AoK is headed, "A 'Gravitational' Analogue, Extant within
All Central Nervous Systems, is Responsible for the Phenomenon of
Prejudice".
Nervous systems' functioning is blindly attracted to TD E/I(min) "states.
the slaugher happens be-cause the way such happens within nervous systems is
not generally understood.
when it is understood, the understanding exists, physically, within the
microscopic trophic modifications which encode it. this physically-real
stuff alters the neural topology, which turns off the blind automation,
thus, ending the blind attraction to TD E/I(min), altering behavior, and the
slaughter ceases.
>Well, I don't understand this stuff (certainly not THIS stuff, i.e.
>this opaque and meandering collection of odd phrases). Am I at risk of
>murdering someone?
seems you've been doing a fairly-"good" job of such in my case, Frank.
>One more try at decoding: Our brain function makes our brains function
>so as to do something or other with regard to what has become
>"merely-familliar"--to be more attentive to what is familiar? Too
>FUNCTION in a familiar way?? And if we are not aware of this we will
>murder people??
:-)
i don't care if =you= don't understand, Frank.
>I think this failure to communicate (this fundamental inability to say
>something clearly and unambiguously) may explain your "house arrest"
>and failure to persuade anyone in the scientific coommunity to ttake
>you (much less your "ideas") seriously.
Frank, AoK was written as a study guide to the existing literature. the
concepts discussed in AoK are new. there was no existing vocabulary, so i
had to just describe the new concepts using words that "paint their
pictures" in folks' minds.
it's much easier to do everything during a chaulk-board session because it's
all =topological=... =directionalities= must be kept straight... it's why
i'm always going on about "moving toward" and "moving away from", blah,
blah, blah.
the =directionality= of behavior derives in =topologically-distributed=
E/I-minimization.
>Maybe an editor or re-write man would help??
both would, and so would some "time" to, as is proposed in the Preface of
AoK, extend AoK to the "state" of a full-featured
Neuroanatomy-Neurophysiology text.
i wrote AoK in about 2 months. ever since then, i've used all of my personal
resources trying to find an opportunity to communicate it's stuff in more
detail to folks who, if they were so inclined, could, then, comment upon
whether or not the work deserved a more-complete written statement. folks
cannot imagine how trying to achieve such for something as radically new as
NDT drains one's financial resources.
i'm left, finally, unemployed, and it seems, unemployable, because so many
folks know about my efforts to win a hearing for the understanding... and
they tend to be more-influenced by the "fear" that jackasses spread than
anything i've been able to do.
i do see that there might be "ulterior motives" in what you're doing, Frank,
but you're overstepping the bounds of propriety.
i am going to wait for an in-person presentation opportunity.
as far as i'm concerned, nothing else will happen until that happens...
except that the mean-spiritedness that's blocked the communication of the
understanding will continue to be further delineated, much to my Sorrow.
K. P. Collins
