I think presenting you OR your work in public would be an embarassment
to all concerned. Be grateful for tthe relative anonymity of the
internet.
In <#3ByV0m0#GA.332 at cpmsnbbsa05> "Ken Collins" <KPaulC at email.msn.com>
writes:
>>i stand on what i've posted.
>>it's my resolve to continue, as i've been continuing, until folks in
>Neuroscience allow me to present the work i've done in-person... i
cannot
>guess, Frank.
>>K. P. Collins
>>F. Frank LeFever wrote in message
<7n0shp$1m5 at dfw-ixnews13.ix.netcom.com>...
>>In <uCyI1yV0#GA.352 at cpmsnbbsa03> "Ken Collins" <KPaulC at email.msn.com>
>>writes:
>>>>>>ORFNUGEN6 wrote in message
>><19990718113519.04352.00002152 at ng-cf1.aol.com>...
>>>>"Ken Collins" <KPaulC at email.msn.com> wrote:
>>>>> the 'color blue' is precisely defined in terms of it's
>>>>> electromagnetic spectrum, and the correlated energy-flow.
>>>>>>>>Your problem is that you are confusing the cause
>>>>with its effect.
>>>>>>i used to (a couple of decades ago) uncritically take a similar
>>approach,
>>>and i carried it forward a bit, unquestioned, but it is naive.
>>>>>>>- - - - - -(snip))- - - - - - - - -
>>>>Ken, GET A JOB!
>>>>Bad enough you miss his point entirely, but it is embarassing to see
>>you pile the bologna deeper and deeper. You still haven't a clue,
have
>>you?
>>>>F. LeFever
>>>>
