Bruce Lilly wrote:
>> "Jeffrey P. Utz, M.D." wrote:
> >
> > Religion is defined as a cause, principle or system of beliefs held to with
> > arbor and faith (Marrium Webster, 10th ed). Science does definitely fit
> > this definition.
>> Nope. Science is a method of determining provisional information about
> observable phenomena. It is not a "cause" or a "system of beliefs" and neither
> "arbor" nor "faith" have any role in science.
Well, "arbor" does have a role in botany, doesn't it...?
Wish you people would drop alt.brain and bionet.neuroscience if you have
to keep this thread going. Thank you in advance.
--
Tore Lund <tl001 at online.no>
