peppermill at my-deja.com wrote in message <7mu29s$frt$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Oh dear! I described a God that was omniscient but not omnipotent. I
>suppose that our speculations have to fit the stereo types to avoid
>offending believers and nonbelievers. Oh thats right we can't
>speculate. It's an either or thing.
>Peppermill.
well b4 you say anything why don't you tell us what kind of stereotype the
particular god your speculating about conforms to. otherwise your statements
lose any sort of meaning and we can't respond to them properly because we
have no clue what you are talking about.
the thread was about an omniscient god, who created humans and gave them
free will; you cant expect us to just implicitely understand that the god
you are refering to is not omnipotent. for a lot of people the concept of
god is of something that is omnipotent and yes to them it is meaningless to
speculate on a god that isn't omnipotent. such a thing to them would not be
god it would be something else.
dan
