ken collins wrote in message
<19990708135848.24110.00012099 at ng-ca1.aol.com>...
>it's wrong because it's =impossible= to say anything further without first
>having fully accounted for all the activity-dependent stuff.
>>one cannot say this or that with respect to chemo factors, etc, without
having,
>first, fully accounted for the activity-dependent stuff... which goes all
the
>way down into the DNA energy transformations which underpin all the chemo
>stuff.
>[...]
is there no one who understands that NDT, which is briefly introduced in
AoK, constitutes the full-accounting referred to above?
somebody, please tell me why this Science is being censored.
K. P. Collins
