On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:32:47 -0400, "John Passaniti"
<jpass at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>You're at least the second person who has proposed a logo for Forth.
>>I guess what I'm missing here is why a language even needs a logo. I
>can see a particular implementation of Forth possibly having a logo,
>but why does Forth itself need a logo? What purpose would it serve?
>What other languages have logos associated with them, and what
>benefits have users or vendors of the language had because of it?
>>I think Forth needs a whole lot more than a logo.
TeX has a logo. And goodness don't all of the major platforms
for TeX. Of course, not a picture logo, because it's a typesetting
system: a ``games with print'' logo. I think that the logo for Forth
should be
Forth, OK?
(
----------
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Newcastle,
ecbm at cc.newcastle.edu.au
)
