In article <7luii4$7gh$1 at its.hooked.net>, Bloxy's at hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote:
>In article <931296614.625.91 at news.remarQ.com>, "Gary Forbis"
> <forbis at accessone.com> wrote:
>>Bloxy,
>>At times you're a hard nut to crack.
[...]
[...]
>>Maybe there are times a choreographer will indicate a stumble so as to draw
>>attention to the movement surrounding it.
[...]
>> If so, can I take your use of
>>"sucking"
>>as something like a stumble within the movement, that is a way to draw
>>attention
>>to the surrounding text?
Well, you have to get a credit for this idea.
Yes, it is something along these lines.
We sit here, talking all these nice formalities,
getting carried away to the point of obscenity,
relying on these perfect functional models of intelligence,
and here comes the stumble.
And the amazing thing how much commotion that word sucking
creates.
We talk about intelligence but get carried away in emotional
domain.
Now, that looks suspicious.
Why would "intelligent" person get completely freaked out
by ANY word?
So here comes a stumble.
They fall on their face.
Get up, sometimes alert, sometimes not,
and they even begin to see some things
they did not pay any attention to before.
That is how we draw attention to the surrounding text.
Just don't tell anybody.
Good luck.
[...]
