In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.990707104723.2112B-100000 at gol>, Ralph Leonhardt <leo at neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Bloxy's wrote:
>> In article <7ludt3$3si at dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F.
> Frank LeFever) wrote:
>.....
>> >He seems to be saying, "you can't analyse or duplicate intelligence,
>> >because you just can't.
>> Nope, that is what YOU are saying.
>> What me is saying is that you don't even have a slightest clue of
>> what intelligence is, or do you, doc?
Anotherwords, in order to duplicate something,
at least you have to know what are you duplicating.
Kinda slow here with neuron activity.
>> Forget about "duplicating" it.
[before you even comprehend its scope]
>> It is unique, non duplicatable.
>Well, that's just what he said you seemed to have been saying!
>.....
>> > "I don't care how intelligent it seems to be,
>> > if it's not natural intelligence, it really isn't!"
>> No, you donkey.
>Now, how impolite can you get? (Yes, I know you can do more than this
Zo, what is yer kwestion?
> but
>is it necessary?)
