synthesys at mindspring.com (George Buckner) wrote:
> ASSOCIATION FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Ohoh, was that that ... hoard last summer solstice in Bremen seeming
to have manged to run an entire congress on that without the
"Alzheimer areas" being discussed much as main topics
but instead having stuff to do with abusing people of other races?
If so, my personal opinion is that I could go to the next
self-perceiver and get better stuff than THAT.
> CALL FOR PAPERS PRESENTERS FOR A CONFERENCE ON:
Lol.
Folks, some day contemplate to learn magic perception.
At least I doubt that you will come far in perceiving much about each
others I areas without that, or do you want to link them with some
papers or machines, heehee...
(Apart from that I find magic one of several rather neat ways to study
older brain function settings.)
> CONSCIOUSNESS AND SELF: NEURAL, COGNITIVE, AND PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES
I suggest to alter the title into consciousnesses and selves.
Or to say which you mean.
I mean, given the philosphical stuff I guess that you are referring to
the own centers, but it might seem an itsibitsy more bright if you
explicitly say that you are just wanting the own areas and not the
non-thinking with consciousness and self.
(Minus 2O on Capital Errors in the title stuff. Grin.)
>Consciousness involves not just the passive experience of sensory
>contents,
CYBERCOUGH...
Naa, that's too bad to comment, that gets too stupid even for my
taste.
(And I read the rest, that was so bad, some religious stuff has less
errors in it.)
