In article <36A231B9.7B7E5D39 at mindspring.com>, Paul Rosete
<prosete at mindspring.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your sentiment, Richard. It was kind of you to reply so
> promptly in the manner in which you did. Your info on Aspartame was, indeed,
> factual and consistemt with the others I received as responses to my
> question.
>> Thanks again!
>> Richard Norman wrote:
>> > I apologize for my rudeness in misinterpreting your post.
> > I was reacting to a history of problems which were no fault
> > of yours.
> >
> > However, the post that you forwarded is an example of the
> > overblown rhethoric often promulgated by the anti-aspartame
> > people. I wrongly responded to that, rather than to your
> > inquiry.
> >
> > Although the tone of my response was inappropriate, at least
> > I did try to include some factual information on the situation --
> > yes aspartame does "contain" methanol, but not very much.
> >
> > >It was just a question; don't know why you interpreted it as a flame.
> > >Being new to the 'net, I guess I don't yet have the knack for writing
> > >posts so that readers like you don't interpret them as flames.
> > >
> > >In my post I said I have a _fondness_ for Diet Cokes (this being the
> > >reason why my friend sent me a copy of her office e-mail). I'm not sure
> > >why you interpreted this as not liking "the stuff." As for hysteria,
> > >again, how could I have worded my general question without referencing
> > the
> > >article? I believe I indicated that I was skeptical about its claim and
> > >wanted to get some opinions from those who were versed in this issue,
> > or,
> > >at least, had some knowledge about it.
> > >
> > >Next time, ignore my posts...or at least read them correctly.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Paul Rosete <prosete at mindspring.com>
>>>>> --
> Paul Rosete <prosete at mindspring.com>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For e-mail reply, please remove the X from <Xprosete>
> ThanXs!
If Betty Martini rediscovers this group I am leaving for sure!!