IUBio

Z.P.E. definition (condensed)

Don P. esoxl at juno.com
Wed Jan 13 13:25:00 EST 1999


Richard Sargent wrote:

> ZPE seems to be in defiance of what is earthly and that which obeys the 'laws' and
> generalizations postulated and tested by humans throughout this age of technological
> development.

   True, to an extent. In defiance of the *known*  or *disclosed*'laws' yes.  Let's not
forget that before the  infamous MM's Null experiment,
that many believed that an 'aether' (whatever that may be) permeated
all of space.  Even after MM's Null experiment, many still believed there
existed an aether, including Michelson himself.

  In light of this, the "comes from nowhere" or "just because" explaination
regarding  where the 'virtual photon cloud' comes from that surrounds
an induced charge, is not "obeying"  any law that I know of, and is not
an acceptable explaination by any means.

  The qauntum vacuum fluctuations/ZPE (or whatever)  explaination of
where these 'virtual photons' comes from, in my eyes just another term
for the Aether that permeates all of space.

  In a sense the ZPE/Aether is not in defiance with earthly laws, without
it there may not be what we call 'charge', among *many* other things.

> Getting something for nothing is a difficult thing to conceptualize.

   Only semantically.  Is there really such a thing as *no thing* in spacetime.As far
as I am concerned my solar calculator gets something for nothing.
Of course I realize that just because I cannot SEE the photons, does not imply
that *no thing* is being used to power my calculator.

  Why can't we say the same about the ZPE/Aether?  Just because modern
science has not publicly quantized the substance that IS the ZPE/Aether,
does not mean that it is *no thing*.  It obviously is *some thing*.

  The day may come when pocket calculators are powered by the ZPE/Aether,
*similar* to the solar calculator today.   Maybe this technology already exists.
Maybe this technology has existed for 50 or more years.  To suggest that it
will NEVER exist, is in my opinion a poor speculation.

   I do not consider the ZPE/Aether as "nothing".

> But perhaps there may very well be a cost, [when the means necessary to unleash this
> ubiquitous energy source is discovered.]

   Maybe, maybe not. This IS where the fun is!!  ;)

> Is anyone familiar with contemporary
> research on Zero Point Energy?

    I have seen many theories of the ZPE/Aether at the web site (and elsewhere)
that I posted previously.  I have read of accounts of utilizing the ZPE/Aether
as a fuel source, but all are very much out of the main stream of science and
not recognized as *real* science. I might add that most (if not all) are NOT
put up for inspection, which in my opinion may be good reason for mainstream
science not to recognize that the ZPE/Aether can be utilized as an efficient fuel
sourse.

  To answer you question,  no. There is not much to find regarding "contemporary
research on Zero Point Energy" (that is easily accessible).  If you find some
information, please pass it on. OTOH, I do remember reading patents that described
utilizing ZPE in some way, through a IBM Web patent server.  I'll will try to locate
these url's and pass them along.

   However, It is my opinion that the Podkletnov experiment (and it's
duplications)  do infact involve the ZPE/Aether.  As far as I know though,
there is no information available that links the Podkletnov work with
the ZPE/Aether (other than my own work, and specualtions).

   My research involves the construction of a device that is somewhat a
*combination* of the work of Hans Coler's magnetostromapparat,
the Podkletnov work, and the work of Floyd Sweet.  The effects are
spurious at best, and nothing to get excited about, yet.



--
Kind Regards
Don Palermo






More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net