di> From: Richard Sargent <dsargent at ix.netcom.com>
di> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:41:59 -0500
di> F. Frank LeFever wrote:
> Ahh, the new kkollins! Often in error, never in doubt!
>> After some "clever" gobbledigook to show his contempt for the question,
di> Not contempt for, but amusement by. How does 'porcine' anything
di> belong in this ng? For crying out loud, that means 'pig'. I know
di> because I read 'Animal Farm' a few months ago. I interpretted,
This would seem to be the extent of your literature search.
di> Ah, pride strikes again! Excuse me for not being able to have 1 or
di> 2 job/graduate designations under my name as you seem to enjoy
di> making reference to. I think I do not need to make an exit; rather,
I think you will find that extolling your lack of education in a topic you
a pontificating on is only seen as a virtue in FRZ groups. This is a
`bionet' group. Its topic is `neuroscience'. *Dr* Lefever happens to be a
neuroscientist. I an a neuroscience student. You are a blowarse.
!Plonk.
Terry
--
| Australia - Howard's '50s Theme Park. #