IUBio

CCK

Richard Sargent dsargent at ix.netcom.com
Tue Jan 12 08:41:59 EST 1999



F. Frank LeFever wrote:

> Ahh, the new kkollins!  Often in error, never in doubt!
>
> After some "clever" gobbledigook to show his contempt for the question,

Not contempt for, but amusement by.  How does 'porcine' anything belong in
this ng?  For crying out loud, that means 'pig'.  I know because I read
'Animal Farm' a few months ago.  I interpretted, correctly I think, someone
just trying to put multisyllabic words together [which seem meaningless in
context with 'intramuscular administration'] and had some fun with it.
Please, Mr. PhD, (or anyone else who is such a loser as to try to mock my
admittedly narrow field of neuroscientific knowledge (I only just started
to learn about neurological topics and relevant parallel applications))
show us how applicable porcine cholecystokinin is to neuroscience
discussion [as stated].  am I bitter at your superciliousness?  No, I think
that you are a sorry little man who needs to have his family commiserate
with him so he can find the strength to continue functioning during his
pitiful, miserable existence.

> our new neuroscience expert tells us CCK is not relevant to
> neuroscience.  I'm not sure, but I THINK I saw a few poster
> presentations on CCK at the Society for Neuroscience meeting in LA last
> November (my presentation was on a different topic and I do not try to
> keep up with the CCK lit).  In any case, CCK is yet another substance
> found first in the gut or other nonbrain tissues (cf. serotonin,
> substance P, histamine, etc.) and later found to have a significant
> role in the brain.
>
> I think it is clear who belongs in a different newsgroup...

Ah, pride strikes again!  Excuse me for not being able to have 1 or 2
job/graduate designations under my name as you seem to enjoy making
reference to.  I think I do not need to make an exit; rather, someone needs
to dismount from their high horse.

> F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
> New York Neuropsychology Group
>
> In <369AAC11.75513797 at ix.netcom.com> Richard Sargent
> <dsargent at ix.netcom.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >ricyoung at iupui.edu wrote:
> >
> >> Could anyone tell me what newsgroup I should direct this question
> to, or
> >> maybe someone here knows....
> >> Is porcine cholecystokinin exactly structurally analogous to human
> CCK?
> >
> >Actually, PCCK has an expansive effect on porcine organelles while its
> >humano-homologue is strictly contractive to the human gallbladder.
> >
> >> Would porcine cholecystokinin become antigenic after intramuscular
> >> administration?
> >
> >It depends on your inertial reference frame.  A tissue biopsy may be
> >conclusive as regards the effects of PCCK.
> >
> >>  If so, is there a comercially available recombinant CCK>?
> >
> >Personally, I wouldn't invest in PCCK if I were you.  However, the
> HCCK  can
> >be solenized into iguano-cholecystokinin and recombined with
> multicultural RNA
> >strands independent of mitochondrial abiogenesis.
> >
> >
> >> andy young
> >>
> >> ricyoung at ruby.iupui.edu
> >
> >  To answer your question about what would be the choice newsgroup for
> a post
> >of this sort, this definitely would not be material for a neuroscience
> >newsgroup.  Look for a biology newsgroup.
>

  Peter L. Sargent




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net