IUBio

Mechanisms of Grandiosity

F. Frank LeFever flefever at ix.netcom.com
Tue Jan 5 23:19:08 EST 1999


I have to admit I agree with Cijadrachon in most of this.  (Her
criticism of my post perhaps suffers from her not understanding its
context)

F. LeFever



In <368fd444.110357507 at news.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
cijadra at zedat.fu-berlin.de (Cijadrachon) writes: 
>
>Mechanisms of Grandiosity
>...that so many of us here seem to have in such abundance:
>
>;-)
>
>flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever) wrote:
>
>>How naive of us to think that someone around whom the whole world
>>revolves could be impressed by our frail human attempts at pointing
out
>>his errors...
>
>If you'd be as or more critical concerning yourself as others you'd be
>busy.
>And I am impressed with how unconstructive your criticism at times is.
>For people who do not claim to have anything to do with healing that
>is different, but true healers tend to have a tendency to not aim at
>themselves and feeding off their third emotion generator like some
>male teenage prol.
>
>And are you referring to some kind of own multiple personality with
>"US" or what? Me you certainly do not mean, apart from that I am of
>course of the First World of the universe according to my education,
>and therefore prefer to have that revolve around me.
>
>Maybe your frail human attempts would be more effective if they would
>seem less like eg.3 ruling your areas and eg.1 more, or if at least
>there was nothing seeming to indicate that you are out for the slings
>and arrows of some primitive rankfighting, and you were loving those
>involved or at least estimating them highly.
>
>As long as it is some rank thingie, I'd appreciate certain people not
>to be WEing while going orcing, as the other orcs and megalomaniacs in
>the round like to have their own rounds in that and not be WEd by
>someone who's the type to recommend damaging others with drugs and
>electricity to cover inabilities as a healer...
>
>>kkollins at pop3.concentric.net writes: 
>>... you'll find that =after= the Gulf War (which was Necessity), 
>What was Necessity about that?
>
>>>all the "attacks", including the one
>>>> that's occurring as I write this, have had one thing in Common...
>
>>>> The "time" course, Inherent, is a veritable Reflection of what's
>>>> occurred here in bionet.neuroscience, sci.techniques.xtallography
>>and alt.religion.gnosis... my read is that all this goes directly
back
>>to the Attempted-Theft of the Understanding, at the NRL, in 1983.
>>>> =Non-Elected= folks are coverin' their butts by _Wag[ging] The
Dog_.
>>K.P. Collins
>
>Excuse me, but did you forget to wake up the front in the morning
>after taking some stuff last night?
>
>I can elect three people to hit you in the head and give me 30% of
>what you own and call it tax as well and say that though you elected
>against that that I was elected and therefore if I declare you and
>whata you earn(ed) mine is O.K.
>Election usually means it is unfree land, or there would be something
>like Social Individualism or some other form valuing what in France
>was called egalite highest.
>
>>>Saddam Hussein =Deserves= to Fall =Hard= for his Murderous Ravaging
of
>>>the People of Kuwait, and his attempt to Dictate to the whole Arab
>>>World... 
>What nonsense are you babbling?
>I do not recall any attempt of him to dictate norther African nor most
>other Arab places.
>But since you seem convinced of that would you tell me in how many
>Arab places apart from Kuwait be tried? 
>And if his first language is Arabic? 
>If you are looking for Murderous Ravagings I recommend texts of
>Amnesty International about the USA police,
>and if you are looking for peoples occupied by force and killing, I
>recommend to study the occupied lands of Red Indians of North America.
>
>
>>>"Saddam", who by this "time" doesn't even know which way is "up"
>>>anymore...
>
>I'd assume that up is where the bombs came down from occupiers of Red
>Indian lands whose lands had never been attacked by Saddam, but who
>seem to like to kill people elseplace; the murdering rate within the
>own country and the blood it is founded upon never seemed sufficient.
>
>To your information: Attacks on Kuwait are of the past, and if you are
>interested in that you sure can tell me where Saddam got the money for
>the weapons for the attack upon them from and what there is to land
>claims he said to have made, and who ruled in Kuwait before and is
>ruling there now?
>
>I have not heard from attacks to Kuwait in a while.
>
>Last war I heard occupiers of the lands of the Red Indians of North
>America were attacking Iraq together with Brits where last I paid more
>attention to them before that there seemed to be stuff going on in
>Ulster that made me wonder if for a while the bombs would stop blowing
>up people there.
>
>There was no attack against Britain or the occupiers of Red Indian
>lands within the Red Indian lands reported.
>
>That people of Britain went killing in Iraq worried me, as we are
>neighbours, and I would not like to have a war going between persons
>from Iraq and Britain over my breakfast table.
>
>Also this is not longer the age for wars, and if some maniacs go on,
>some of those who claim that Nostradamus said that there'd be some
>serious war before the end of this year might be right after all.
>
>I am glad that in Russia and China some seemed to have seen the
>seriousness of the  situation.
>
>I hope it is not too late.
>
>And your UN references sounded rather odd to me.
>
>If  you look at who has the veto there and at the structure  you might
>notice that the UN is a power system and not much to do with freedom.
>
>One look at Kurdistan already tells volumes about certain things.
>
>I tended to joke that the Kurds should pump up oil or pretend to have
>found something else of value in their area.
>
>If the UN had any brains at all they'd apolgize to the people of Iraq,
>offer to send volunteers with the reconstruction, make holiday
>programs for people wishing to meet other people (especially in
>Britian and the USA) and receive them back for visits, and request
>Iraq if they could send teacher to the people and children of Britain
>and the USA to learn their language to prevent future wars and
>misunderstandings by the people coming to understand each other
>better.




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net