Oh, well, might as well say it: all the cells are busy all the time,
but the brain as a whole is used for nothing very important by most
people at least 90% of the time...
(I could cite some good examples right from this newagroup...)
F. LeFever
In <36936531.C5404452 at cs.usyd.edu.au> Mark James <mrj at cs.usyd.edu.au>
writes:
>>DK wrote:
>>> As I told the other fellow who pointed this out (by the way, I know
someone
>> who undoubtedly could dance a jig and type at the same time--but not
very
>> well), good point. I failed to think out what I myself was saying.
As I
>> added there, though, it just seems to me to reinforce the idea that
no part
>> of the brain is actually "dormant" as these 10% (etc.) theories have
it.
>>Although the 10% figure was probably chosen because of its
>roundedness rather than because of any scientific evidence,
>I think it is plausible that most of us use only a fraction
>of our brain's capacity.
>>Even if no area of the brain is "dormant", and all neurons get
>regular workouts, there can still be vast unused synaptic
>capacity. Vast numbers of possible memories, represented by
>combinatorial activation of sets of neurons, just never become
>activated.
>>I think we could all stuff in many more memories. It's just
>not essential for most people's lives. Watching a concert
>pianist always leaves me in awe of the learning capacity of
>the human brain -- Mark
>>--
>Mark James |EMAIL :
mrj at cs.usyd.edu.au|
>================- WEB: http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~mrj-=================