dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
>>kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:
> > Your post constitutes Libel. K. P. Collins
>> > Krakatoa wrote:
> > > No, most of what he posts is just totally worthless garbage. Turns out the
> > > same is true of what you post. What a surprise.
>> I had to look up "libel" in Webster's to be sure, but:
> It seems to me that in order to show libel you must prove that his
> allegations are unjust or false. Fortunately, this is not a court of
> law.
>> Dag Stenberg
I stand on what I posted, Dag. The comments constitute Libel be-cause
they use my person, in a 3rd-party way, to demean another person.
Doing such places my person in the untennable position of being involved
in criticism of a 3rd person through no choice, or action, of my own.
On my own behalf, I do not pursue redress in such matters. But I'm
obliged, and always stand ready to pursue redress, on behalf of the 3rd
parties.
My purpose, short of a request from any 3rd parties that have been
demeaned through the Libelous use of my person, are Educational. This
sort of 3rd-party Libel is totally unacceptable, and it's important that
folks get such straght.
K. P. Collins (ken)