IUBio

On the line or over the line?

kkollins at pop3.concentric.net kkollins at pop3.concentric.net
Sat Jan 2 15:16:20 EST 1999


dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
> 
> kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:
> > Your post constitutes Libel. K. P. Collins
> 
> > Krakatoa wrote:
> > > No, most of what he posts is just totally worthless garbage. Turns out the
> > > same is true of what you post. What a surprise.
> 
> I had to look up "libel" in Webster's to be sure, but:
>   It seems to me that in order to show libel you must prove that his
> allegations are unjust or false. Fortunately, this is not a court of
> law.
> 
> Dag Stenberg

I stand on what I posted, Dag. The comments constitute Libel be-cause
they use my person, in a 3rd-party way, to demean another person.

Doing such places my person in the untennable position of being involved
in criticism of a 3rd person through no choice, or action, of my own.

On my own behalf, I do not pursue redress in such matters. But I'm
obliged, and always stand ready to pursue redress, on behalf of the 3rd
parties.

My purpose, short of a request from any 3rd parties that have been
demeaned through the Libelous use of my person, are Educational. This
sort of 3rd-party Libel is totally unacceptable, and it's important that
folks get such straght.

K. P. Collins (ken)



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net