Meant to write, of course, "COMPLETING the learning of a task"!
In <7o36ie$ktp at dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> flefever at ix.netcom.com(F.
Frank LeFever) writes:
>>In <933430839.761743 at server.australia.net.au> "John"
><johnhkm at netsprintXXXX.net.au> writes:
>>>>http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/10/RC1>>>>>>"The pre-SMA activation remained unchanged during learning of
>>associations but decreased during learning of sequences, suggesting
>>pre-SMA is related to visuo-motor association rather than sequence"
>>>>>Haven't read it, but I'll offer the following:
>>DECREASING activation has in some other contexts been related to
>competing the learning of a task, I believe.
>>A patient of mine had some visual-associative prooblems which I
>suggested might be due to problems with posterior circultation (I had
>become much interested in transient vertebrobasilar insufficiency as
>well as infarcts in various distal reaches of their distribution,
>myu first experience with a locked-in patient). She also had enormous
>difficulties with a sequencing task (actually an altrenating sequence
>borrowed from Luria).
>>The attending (a neurologist) was scathing--"Vertebrobasilar lesions
>are SO overdiagnosed!!" However, after he, a visiting neurologist,
>one or two neurology residents couldn't decide whether they had
>elicited a Babinski reflex, they ordered a CT, looking for enlarged
>ventricles--i.e., normopressure hydrocephaly--to explain her
>(which I knew from my neuropsychological testing she definitely did
>> CT showed bilateral infarcts in (1) visual cortex or nearby
>(verifying my suspicion about posterior circulation), and (2)
>dorso-medial frontal cortex (i.e. SMA).
>>This lovely and definitely non-demented elderly lady was not dismayed
>to learn she had a non-treatable condition, but was grateful to learn
>that she did not have possibly hereditary dementing disorder to pass
>to her grandchildren...
>>F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
>New York Neuropsychology Group