K C Cheng (kccheng at postoffice.idirect.com) wrote:
: Why should photons remain photons in the speeding form? Can't they
: become stationary electromagnetic particles on being stopped and be
: taken into electrons? In fact, this is the basis of photoelectricity
: proven by Einstein. When travelling photons are teken into electrons of
: a metal, an electric current arises carrying the photonic
: electromagnetic particles inside them. How else could they have become
: so activated into flowing free electrons? This also occurs in the
: nervous system. If photons can become stationary inclusions in the
: electrons of photoelectricity, why can't they become the same in the
: nervous system? =
In the photoelectric effect (which was discovered well before
Einstein was born), shining light on a metal plate causes electrons
to be ejected from the plate. Einstein's part was to explain the
emission of the electrons as a quantum effect. When the photon
is absorbed, the electrons gain in kinetic energy and some of the
electrons end up escaping from the metal. Please note that the
photon no longer exists.
: As I said, I welcome questions of this nature. However, please do not
: jump to conclusions before reading all of my writings. =
It's clear that your knowledge of the material about which you
write is woefully lacking. Why should anyone want to read them?
There is plenty of material available upon which to make a solid
judgement.
: Memory being electromagnetic particles is rather difficult to accept.
: That's because it's difficult to prove.
It is very difficult to prove the impossible.
: That's why it has taken me 20
: volumes to make it so convincing that one can see them go in, and see
: them come out.
Please cite any legitimate peer-reviewed journals which back up
your claims.
: This is particularly so the case in my video, about
: 13~14 hours, that I am completing.
: Of course, I can't put 13 hours of video on the web. Those of you who
: are skeptical enough would have a chance to see the whole thing next
: January on its world-wide release. I understand that people would not
: wish to shell out $125 for something they could not be sure of its
: absolute value.
We can be sure. Absolute value should be about the value of the
tapes so we can tape over them.
: So, maybe you all should consider having some people out
: there doing a comprehensive assessment and tell you that it's more than
: your money's worth. =
You're just trying to sell snake oil.
: As I said, I welcome questions on why you think I maybe wrong. I'll
: answer them if it's short and simple. But, otherwise, if you want the
: whole proof, you'll have to buy my videos.
If you really had something of value, you could publish it in
the peer-reviewed journals.
: I can refund you academics
: if you're not satisfied that it's proven beyond the slightest scientific
: doubt. I don't think Einstein guaranteed to refund to those unable to
: understand his Theory of Relativity.
Didn't he publish in the existing journals?
: And, yet, how many bought it?
Most people who could understand it already had access to the journals.
: How
: many bought Darwin when I have refuted him?
You claim to have refuted him. That's all.
: Please do not let skeptism get the best of you. I may be right, and you
: may be wrong. After all, I have time and webspoace to put out only so
: few pages.
Are your thought processes as disorderly as your web pages? I
cannot imagine that anyone would be convinced by them.
: Would I understand Einstein's Theory of relativity had I
: not known his maths?
I'd hate to hear you try to explain tensor analysis on manifolds.
I seriously doubt that you understand much, if anything, about
the subject.
: No! Would I understand it had I not read his whole
: theory?
Once again, there is no reason to suspect that you have any
understanding of the Special or General theories.
: No! So, please wait and see. The proof is the thing in any
: scientific doctrine. Whether right or wrong depends on it. That's why
: only after, not before, reading and digesting the whole proof should
: anyone voice an opinion on the electromagnetism of memory, mentation and
: behavaiur.
There are thousands of kooks who are attempting to pass off their
halucinations as fact. If you want to be taken seriously, publish
your material in legitimate peer-reviewed journals. Otherwise,
don't expect anyone to bother trying to understand the material.
Experience rapidly teaches one that someone who is not highly
knowledgeable about a scientific discipline is extremely unlikely
to be correct when asserting that the current theories are wrong.
: It is incredible that these should be under electromagnetic
: control. But, what if I have proven it? Then, it's real---however
: indredible it may be. =
You haven't proven anything. Assertions to the contrary are either
lies or signs that you have fooled yourself.
Eric Johnson