Look, Dag, I've =never= made any claims that usurp the work of another. AoK is
a syntethesis... it's an outline of how all the formerly-disconnected
experimental results are actually Unified... how could it be otherwise... I've
no Lab... when I worked in the Library, in order to bring myself up to speed in
Neuroscience, I found that what was, then, in the stacks was
vastly-more-comprehensive than what is in the textbooks, and that what was in
the textbooks was enormously-disorganized... when I went to my Profs, saying
that we'd an Obligation to get that stuff out of the Libraries, and Volunteered
to do such because doing such was well-suited to my late-start in the field,
anyway, I was told that I could not do so... so, seeing that this Synthesis
=must= be accomplished, I quit Grad School, and just =Did= it, making it
available, Gratis, in AoK.
I'll not speculate on what's been going on in this Newsgroup, whether, as has
been the case in the past, it is me who is "under the inquisition", or
others...
...but I'll tell you (and anyone else), I've =no= reason to "hang-my-head"... I
just left the Stupid-"Politics" behind, and =Did= what needed to be done... the
rest is B.S... and those who refuse to allow an in-person "Inquisition", before
Fair Witnesses, do =nothing= other than pile up more B. S. There's nothing I
can do about such. I See-Clearly that Free Will =must= be Guarded. K. P.
Collins
dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
> F. Frank LeFever <flefever at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Apparently kkollins is correct: the program does seem to have
> > included a segment on Eric Kandel's work (as well as another segment,
> > on the famous patient HM;
> ...
> > For kkollins not to comment on the unlikelihood that Eric Kandel would
> > be talking about the Krebs cycle in rodents, however, suggests that his
> > knowledge of Kandel's work is nil, and he is just one of thousands
> > millions?) who have heard or seen Kandel's name over the past 2-3
> > decades.
> ...
> > re-shaping memory so that CREB comes out as Krebs cycle is
> > understandable, but what about "in rodents"? Possibly Kandel did speak
> > of his more recent mouse work, but maybe Aplysia was translated as "sea
> > hare" and the listener/viewer heard "hare", thought hares were still
> > classified as rodents, and therefore---!
>> I must admire Frank Le Fever for his untiring work here on the net to
> disclose misconceptions, hallucinations and fraud. I am sorry that I do
> not find the time to take part; the students in my university generate
> enough questions /y'all know: one lunatic can ask more than ten wise men
> can answer). The logic behing the Kandell-Krebs mystery is wonderful.
> Thank you for being the one teacher for this wild bunch! (and of course
> I am serious, though some times this does seem like a serious forum at all)
>> Dag Stenberg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dag Stenberg stenberg at cc.helsinki.fi> Biolääketieteen laitos Biomedicinska instutionen
> Fysiologian osasto Fysiologiska avdelningen
> PL 9 (Siltavuorenpenger 20 J) PB 9 (Brobergsterrassen 20 J)
> 00014 Helsingin yliopisto 00014 Helsingfors universitet
> tel: (0)9-1918532 fax: (0)9-1918681
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
