kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:
: Only to the degree that there are published experimental results... I've
: no Lab... but if there are published experimental results, then all
: =aynyone= needs is the Will to Learn, and cross-correlate there stuff.
:: In my work in Physics, "Tapered Harmony", I've been able to get a handle
: on the general, ionic/molecular case... details are "just" more of the
: same-stuff.
Tapered Harmony? I've never heard of that field and I thought I'd
heard of the vast majority of fields in Physics.
I'll ask my roommate about it. He's working on his PhD in Physics.
By the way, a quick altavista searched failed to find a single use
of the phrase "tapered harmony".
: I don't want to be anyone's "slave", though.
:: BTW, what's the purpose in a response such as yours? Do you see me as
: your "lab rat"? K. P. Collins
Simple. You posted the same message three different times. It strikes
me as if you're trying to get someone to ask you to do it so that you
can say you were "invited to do research on _____ in neuroscience".
I also tend to be suspicious of anyone who writes like you. Scientists,
at least the ones I've known, in many fields tend to be relatively
clear and to the point. Your writing is anything but that. It
definitely portrays you as someone who can't maintain a coherent
thought process. And the way you use buzzwords seems to be for
the purpose of obscuring meaning (or showing how brilliant you
believe yourself to be) rather than to enhance communication. In
contrast, when I'm explaining something to someone who is probably
not familiar with a term, I usually make every effort to explain
the term or to indicate where they can find more information about
the term.
Eric Johnson
