Nicholas had his first neurological review and the results are as follows:
He has been taken off of the B6
He is still on 15mg of Phen. Barb. per day for another 3 months (his next
assessment)
All indications are that he is developing normally.
An interesting point is that from one doctor to another in the same hospital
the view of the CAT scan is different. Initially the CAT scan was indicated
to have been done so that the swelling of the brain had been reduced so that
a proper inidcation of the damaged was shown. The assessing doctor said
that the scan still showed swelling and that the result are not as accurate
as initially indicated.
I have read the initial reports (and have a copy of the scan) and I can
confirm that damage was inidcated.
This still leads to the question, why the different assessments in the same
hospital and department?
Regards,
Guenther
PS I just glad that he's doing well.