IUBio

Explaining keyboards to kccheng

K C Cheng kccheng at postoffice.idirect.com
Sun Nov 15 19:10:04 EST 1998


> F. Frank LeFever wrote:
> =

> >
> > Truly pathetic.
> >
>
> >
> > Just to cite one small example: while kccheng must find the direct
> > imput of photons into the periphery of the visual system "proof enoug=
h"
> > for his simple mind (not knowing of the transduction to neural energy=

> > right at the beginning, i.e. in the rods and cones), what on earth ca=
n
> > he make of the auditory system, wherein the input is not in the form =
of
> > "electromagnetic particles" but in the form of MOLECULES beating
> > against auditory MECHANICAL structures?
> >
> > (Probably he'll say something he thinks is brilliant, like "molecules=

> > are made of electromagnetic particles"!)
> >I understand  many have been working one it. But they missed it.  I ju=
st completed the auditory system, and I assure you, no molecules are invo=
lved. I think you are out of date.  Can you recall the cochlear microphon=
ic?  <olecules there too?   Perhaps you are the ignorant one!
> > Why don't you find a newsgroup with readers who are less critical, if=

> > you want to preserve your illusions of brilliance without so much
> > effort?
> I like cross swords with reasonable people.  But please read up on all
> of it before saying anything againat me.
> > F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
> > New York Neuropsychology Group
> =



-- =

kccheng =BEG=ABa=B8s
http://www.easyhosting.com/~kccheng



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net