> > F. Frank LeFever wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Truly pathetic.
> > > Just to cite one small example: while kccheng must find the direct
> > > imput of photons into the periphery of the visual system "proof enough"
> > > for his simple mind (not knowing of the transduction to neural energy
> > > right at the beginning, i.e. in the rods and cones), what on earth can
> > > he make of the auditory system, wherein the input is not in the form of
> > > "electromagnetic particles" but in the form of MOLECULES beating
> > > against auditory MECHANICAL structures?
> > >
> > > (Probably he'll say something he thinks is brilliant, like "molecules
> > > are made of electromagnetic particles"!)
> > >I understand many have been working one it. But they missed it.
I just completed the auditory system, and I assure you, no molecules are
involved.
I think you are out of date. Can you recall the cochlear microphonic?
<olecules there too? Perhaps you are the ignorant one!
> > > Why don't you find a newsgroup with readers who are less critical, if
> > > you want to preserve your illusions of brilliance without so much
> > > effort?
> > I like cross swords with reasonable people. But please read up on all
> > of it before saying anything againat me.
--
kccheng ¾G«a¸s
http://www.easyhosting.com/~kccheng
