IUBio

Hear radar waves

jwill at pacbell.net jwill at pacbell.net
Sun Nov 8 14:27:45 EST 1998


In article <7230fr$hhe$1 at diana.bcn.ibernet.es>,
  "Teodorico" <jpmouton11 at accesosis.es> wrote:
>
> Peter Heckert escribió en mensaje <71t7gd$g6c3 at msheas02.msh.de>...
>
> [...]
> >There are people which have an inbuild antenna. Think of telepathy.
> >This people are NOT sensitive for EM waves.
> >There is a very serious book ("Mental Radio" by Upton Sinclair)
> >I have the german Edition ("Radar der Psyche") and it has a foreword
> >by Albert Einstein, who happened to be a friend of Upton Sinclair.
> >
> >However,telepathy has nothing to do with RF-transmission.
> >Read this book, if you dont believe.
> (SNIP)
> >In the early times of wireless communication they made all sorts of
> >experiments to use strong ELF fields, for transmitting purposes because
> >they had difficulties to make strong HF fields.
> >If ELF would influence the body, they would have discovered it.
>
> The soviets had known of these effects for decades, however in the West
> there has been a suspicious interest in deny it until very recently. If you
> read previous postings I sent these last days you'll find the non-linearity
> effect as a key. Let's take as a reference the case of the "irradiated"
> American embassy in Moscow again:
>
> 'Impossible, replied the State Department, the waves cannot break through
> the blood-brain barrier, and thermal effects are so negligible that the body
> would not be affected. Nevertheless, embassy personnel were indemnified for
> health damage.
>
> By 1979, at the latest, it was known that electromagnetic fields raising
> body temperatures less than .1 degrees Celsius may result in somatic
> changes. It was most surprising that such a trivial temperature rise was
> having any effects, and even more astonishing that those effects were
> significant.
>
> Chemical, physiological and behavioral changes can occur within "windows" of
> frequency and energy continua. One of those windows is connected with
> navigation in marine vertebrates and with biological rhythms of humans.
> Another is at the level of the human electroencephalogram (EEG), which is in
> the range of extremely low radio and sound waves, around 20 Hertz. [...]
>
> Let us cut the story to the minimum. The original model, according to which
> the blood-brain barrier cannot be broken, was derived from the axiom that
> electromagnetic waves interact with tissue in a linear manner. However, it
> turned out that the molecular vibrations caused by a stimulating
> extracellular electromagnetic field are non-linear. Utterly unexpectedly,
> they take the form of soliton waves which can transfer energy along long
> molecular chains. [...]
>
> Significance? Extracellular disturbances such as acoustic or electromagnetic
> bursts can be propagated across the cell membrane. In this, non-linearities
> in molecular dynamics rather than chemical kinetics are the key. Put
> differently, the 12-magnitude energy deficit is overcome, not by brute
> force, but by the formation of solitons.
>
> Visualize the brain and its environment as structures of waves, and assume
> that shock waves create solitons. Then imagine that modern electronics with
> their flexibility, accuracy and speed are put to work.
>
> In addition, the range of resonances probably will be increased. Hence many
> frequencies, and several options for the transmission of energy across the
> membranes of brain cells may become available. This may imply that the brain
> cells will be reachable diversely and flexibly, and perhaps routinely.
>
> The discovery of cross-membrane coupling may be compared to the discovery of
> oxygen in 1772, which allowed the proof that phlogiston, the supposed
> element of fire, does not exist. Once the phlogiston idea was buried,
> chemistry and the chemical industry began their triumphal march across the
> world. [...]
>
> The theory of cross-coupling was formulated by A.S. Davydov who, it seems,
> published the first purely theoretical version in 1976, and followed this up
> with a study on "Solitons as energy carriers in biological systems". By 1979
> Davydov appeared to be linked to the Ukrainian Academy of Science. [...]
>
> In the US, the pioneering work seems to have been done by Albert F. Lawrence
> and W. Ross Adey, writing in Neurological research, Volume 4, 1982.
>
> The Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry in Munich also discovered that
> cell membranes can be crossed. Eberhard Neumann and Guenther Gerisch found
> that a shock wave passing through an electric field may create ultra-quick
> processes within the membrane, and that through such "jumps in the field"
> (Feldsprfinge: this probably means solitons) senes can be transmitted and
> cells fused.
>
> There is a differential in the tension of the inner and outer membrane which
> averages 1/70,000 of a volt. This corresponds to 70,000 volts per
> (theoretical) membrane thickness of one centimeter. (The real thickness of a
> membrane is 0.1<-8> centimeter.)
>
> The discovery was made unexpectedly in the course of research on electric
> fields in membranes and their impact on vital processes. This research
> requires measurements of events lasting not more than one nano-second (one
> billionth of a second), and it suggested that solitons generally increase
> the permeability of membranes. Thus, new perspectives on genetic
> "engineering" were suddenly opened. Moreover, it was possible to fuse no
> less than 50 cells into one supercell with 50 nuclei and one single
> membrane. We might as well forego assessing this monstrous novelty.'
> (Dr. Stephan Possony - 1983, July) Excerpt from Cheryl Welsh' report Code of
> the Brain.
>
> Or, about synthetic telepathy, from Alexander Constantine in his book
> `Psychic Dictatorship in the USA´, with some references from the "vanished"
> book of Dr. José Manuel Rodríguez Delgado `Physical Control of the Mind:
> Toward a Psychocivilized Society´ (1969):
>
> 'An "official" halt to PANDORA's excesses was called in 1970, but the
> research had turned a historic corner and classified RF mind control testing
> quickly became a military armed drugs, ECT, torture, brain surgery or most
> other forms of behaviour modification. The CIA and Pentagon concentrated
> their efforts on electromagnetism. Why the fuss? A computerized form of
> telepathy.
> "Biocommunication," the dream of Richard Helms, was tested on human within a
> few years of his memo to the Warren Comission. The CIA had achieved direct
> communication between brain and computer by the last sixties,

I cease believing in what you are writing here.   I agree that sounds may
be heard because of microwave action on the auditory sensory system.
Messages mat be conveyed by these apparent sounds.

If any one is interested in some of the actual Russian research, I
can provide references (names of researchers)  Emailed to me a while ago
from Russia.   The breakdown of the Soviet Union (which was the Cold
War enemy) caused many microwave researchers in Russia to seek ways
of commercializing their work.  To the best of my knowledge, except
substitution for microwaves for surgical cautery, the only successful
product has been "sexological":  Microwaves can produce erection.

The whole business is too unregulated, in my opinion, because microwave
apparatus can be exceedingly dangerous, as can prescription drugs.


> and had
> demonstrated in the laboratory that computer-assisted automatic learning was
> possible by pin-pointing neurons clusters in the brain with radio signals.
> Microwaves easily penetrated the head's protective shielding of bone and
> membrane. Miniaturization of the receiver linked the mind to a remote
> computer. Brain waves were unscrambled and deciphered, recorded and beamed
> to another person--two way mental communication.'
>
> Remember the work of Fourier...
>
> Thierry Mouton
>
>


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           John
           A Lark! A Lark!
           A Lark for Mister Bark!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net