=Thank You= for taking up the discussion, Frank. I'm working to make
=everything= I'm doing perfectly-obvious... it's just that there's a "gap"
that needs to be bridged, and the perfect-obviousness of what I'm doing
will only become visible to folks after they are able to "travel" the
"bridge"... it's almost completed.
I'll be working elsewhere tonight, but, if it's True, that you'll just do
Neuroscience with me, I'm so =Grateful= to you. And if our interaction
endures, you'll have been the first person to "cross the bridge" (which has
been under construction for 29 years). If not, I'll just continue as best I
can.
I'll be back. ken collins
F. Frank LeFever wrote:
> No, this is certainly not what I was referring to. This does not seem
> to qualify as an example of an "insight" most of us have had and
> subsequently accepted as a truism or rejected, depending on subsequent
> experience and sophistication. So far, I have not seen your use of
> these terms clarified to the extent that one would care to comment on
> them. Your discourse does not focus very well on precise definition or
> description, nor on precise propositions that can be evaluted. It is
> very easily derailed and perfused with what appear to be rather loose
> associations, and sometimes couched in an arch sort of innuendo that
> hints at your vast concern for humanity and sorrow over never very
> clearly stated afflictions or ---??
>> So, no, this is not what I was speaking of. It is a horse of a
> different weird color.
:-)
