In article <71m20l$m72 at dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever) wrote:
>At first, I was going to take his question about electromagnetic
>influences and DNA at face value and tell about my own interest in ELF
>(extremely low frequency) electromagnetic activity (e.g. in sferics)
>and of an interesting recent finding by a long-time (and well
>respected) neuroscientist regarding a possible neurophysiological
>influence,
Good, about time.
> but as I read further began to have sinking feeling as I
>perceived he may have a very private concept of these "electromagnetic
>influences". In the context of some linguistic peculiarities I pointed
>out in another post, this is troubling.
Huh?
Would you conseal the scientific truth on the basis
of this kind?
You just come and state the state of affair as you know it.
Let other people decide for themselves what it is you have.
Else, you'd have to send ALL your posts to KGB or CIA
ideological department of brainwashing before posting
ANY of them on the internet, as you never know who
might be reading it.
Who knows, you may trigger the nukelar
[good spelling, huh. Guess whose is it]
dizasta.
>F. LeFever
>>In <71gs8n$a52$1 at its.hooked.net> Bloxy's at hotmail.com (Bloxy's) writes:
>>>>- - - - - - - - (snip) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>>>What is the conclusion then?
>>What is at the very root of developement?
>>DNA or love?
>>>>What role does the energy play?
>>What role does intent play?
>>>>What determines what?
>>> - - - - - - - -(snip) - - - - - - - - -
>>>>Is there any evidence that suggests the DNA
>>activity is NOT affected by the electromagnetic energy?
>>- - - - - - - - (snip) - - - - - - - -
Suck.
>Then we talk more.
>>What bullshit truism are you talking about?
>>You have not even begun to address the issues of
>>overriding significance of electromagnetic forces
>>and fields.
>>>>> widely known,
>>>>What?
>>What is significance of electromagnetic forces?
>>- - - - - - - - (snip)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Yep, that is all you gots, mr. bio-robot programmer.
Big funken ZERO.
You are willing to withhold the ultimate scientific
truth, you claimed to have discovered, and yet,
being utterly dishonest, you withhold it.
And you think it will remain a secret, huh?
And what secret could you possibly have?
And why did you even begin this post?
And why did not you cancel it, once you realized
it is "dangerous" information for "uneducated majority"?
Tell me, or elitist master-bator,
what is the meaning of life?
