Kalman Rubinson wrote:
> nospam!stenberg at cc.helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
> > This kind of discussion reminds me again about the need to make
> > bionet.neuroscience moderated, and start an
> alt.neuroscience.popular.
>> Agreed. Necessary.
>> Kal
Was my posting too big?
I was just hoping for some actual data. Data that has
not been selected to confirm the theoretical predictions.
Besides that I have interesting questions for simulating
neural networks as well.
I think that if many different disciplines get together we
will find a solution that fits the actual data, but if
we "save" a discipline from interferance from others
there will be no advancements, just affirmations.
Greetings,
Dirk