>On 17 Apr 1998 02:10:24 GMT, "Peter Nelson"
[...]
>>Who cares? We don't need Occam's razor to deal
>>with 'alien abductions'. The case against 'alien abductions'
>>is really a lot simpler - the proponents of 'alien abductions'
>>have failed to present even a single solitary piece of
>>evidence FOR aliens or abductions. Zero. Zilch. While
>>strong claims require strong evidence, they don't even have
>>weak evidence.
[...]
Yeah, but IMHO this doesn't make the whole phenomenon
irrelevant. I think it still merits looking at, through whatever
means may be appropriate.
Lisa
--
I don't think about Jim lgardner at mbay.nethttp://www.geocities.com/soho/cafe/7259