Jim Hunter <jim.hunter at REMOVE_TO_EMAIL.jhuapl.edu> wrote:
>cijadra at zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
> >
> > > TOWARD A SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS 1998
> >
> > Why make it a science?
> > So some idiots eventually mess around connecting a square kilmoeter
>of
> > the right cells for that prupose with a ton of silicon chips?
> >
> > The conscious areas are sacred.
> >
> > Not something to be messed with.
> >
> > They are not made for unnatural huge metal fields, most artificial
> > fields and so on.
> >
>- There are no unnatural metal fields.
>- All metal is natural.
Ah, so we have just nice natural metals, conveniently being on the
surface everywhere in the size of fridges, metal doors, trains,
bridges,... How could I have overlooked that metal fields the size we
have them today have been around the same force & spreading
on the surface before humans dug them out...
>- There's actually nothing sacred about matter.
Did I say that matter in general is sacred?
Maybe you should pay more attention to the actual sentences.