In article <lgd450-1004981020240001 at mac136.cnadc.nwu.edu>, lgd450 at nwu.edu (Angie) wrote:
$$In article <352E26DF.69FA at uthscsa.edu>, casada at uthscsa.edu wrote:
$$
$$> F. Frank LeFever wrote:
$$> >
$$> > re suggestion about moderated group (v. infra, below MN's post): I'm
$$> > for it.
$$>
$$> I second the motion. What do we need to do?
$$>
$$> John
$$
$$Head over to news.groups; someone there will know better. The requirements
$$differ depending on whether you are in the bionet., rec., alt., etc
$$heirarchy.
$$
$$Be prepared for a long and gruelling process though. Having just come
$$away from helping to set up a moderated group in the rec. heirarchy,
$$you're looking at probably a couple of months worth of work minimum.
$$There are multiple requests for discussion (RFDs), calls for votes (CFVs),
$$charters to be set up, moderators to be chosen, vote counts, etc.
$$
$$Good luck,
$$
$$Angie
$$
$$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
$$My life is one big kyo, with momentary bouts of focus.....
So who wants to volunteer for the onerous tasks ahead? If nobody wants to do
it, I can look up the necessary documentation, and such like... I can post to
the ng about this.. otherwise, anybody care to be in email contact with me
regarding this issue? Naturally, as Angie pointed out, theres more to this
than one (or a few) people coming together to set things up?
Suggestions?
