Patanîe Pongpâ wrote:
>Le Wed, 08 Apr 1998 09:31:46 -0400, Peter Kazlouski
[...]
>>chkcorea wrote:
>>> That sleep paralysis theory is crap, it doesn't hold water.
>>> There are people who are having totally conscious abductuctions.
>To be "conscious" DOES NOT mean that you are conscious of exoreal
>events...
>ALL the crap of abductions,"other" lives,etc,can be explained in a
>scientific coherent way.Some people,in the US,look desperately for
>extraordinary events just because they have a
>monotonous,borring,non-extraordinary life. [...]
Hmmm. We know so little. I think that there is a possibility that
we may be constantly experiencing and interacting on levels and
in ways of which we are not consciously aware, and some "past-
life experiences", abductions, etc. might be reflections of this.
And in our attempts to understand our vague awareness of this
"other" level interaction and experience, we try to explain it in terms
of the kind of experience/interaction we are consciously familiar
with and can understand. Hence stories about "past lives", etc.
It seems to me that the ego-based-consciousness (and i don't
know if I am using that term in a strictly correct sense, psychologically
speaking) of which we are aware every day, identify ourselves, and
use to get around and work in our daily environment may be only the
tip of a huge iceberg.
But who knows?
Lisa
--
I don't think about Jim lgardner at mbay.nethttp://www.geocities.com/soho/cafe/7259
