K C Cheng <kccheng at postoffice.idirect.com> wrote:
>cwh wrote:
>>>> I would like to find some information about the brain. About how the brain
>> think and remember things. Can anyone of you have these information? Or is
>> there a homepage talking about it? If yes, please e-mail to me. Thanks.
>>>> Toby Chan
>>cwh at usa.net>re above:
>memory & thinking at
>http://webhome.idirect.com/~kccheng>--
>kccheng:¹¿Â÷÷÷÷÷¥»¼§
The Brain
The Mind Discovered!
It sounds incredible that as elusive, mystical and omnipotent an
entity as the mind could ever have been discovered by a mere human
being.
But ah! only human beings have ever being the discoverers of all
things
in nature-- including God...
... Literally, people do "change their minds:" this moment
wanting to go to a movie, the next moment wanting to drive around the
town.
Therefore, as overwhelmingly proved in my 19 volumes of The
Electromagnetism of Memory, Mentation and
Behaviour, the mind cannot be represented by anatomical features of
the brains.
...The message, nevertheless, is clear that
without doing any Planckian or Einsteinian type of thinking in
theoretical physics,without that level and dimension of thinking,
memory, not to mention the mind, could never have been discovered,
much less demonstrated or proven. And, because of this need for an
advanced or unusual theoretical analysis and proof, we must accept
this type of proof only essential in scientifically establishing and
understanding the mind as an actually existing miracle of nature.
Hence, instead of expecting laboratory or instrumental demonstration
of memory and the mind, we have to accept a theoretical proof as the
only possible way to establish this miracle of science.
Furthermore, just like the Theory of Relativity, discovering and
proving such a mysterious phenomenon as the operations of the mind
being an unusually difficult task,
must be welcomed with a sigh of relief: "Finally, we've got it!"
... Concrete phenomena imply some truth or scientific principles and
therefore serve as the evidence or proof of such truth or principles.
Yet, one has to first derive such principles from these phenomena
before there can be any discoveries to be supported by their
responsible phenomena. But, since these principles were derived from
actual phenomena, once they have been correctly, logically derived
from these phenomena, they would also have been automatically proven
--- because there are those responsible phenomena, whence they came,
to support them. ...
(Phenomenal babbling)
To Order (19 books of it)
KC Cheng Press Home Cheng Institutes Home
