jdoyle at acsu.buffalo.edu wrote in article
<32EF9927.34D6 at msmail.buffalo.edu>...
> Let me try to be as direct and clear as the text under consideration:
[snip]
Since your review (or was it a press release?) consisted entirely of
high-level abstractions, conveying no real meaning, can we assume that the
book you're flacking suffers from the same deficiencies?