kenneth paul collins <KPCollins at postoffice.worldnet.att.net> wrote :
> ... There are always detectable Geometrically-localized experience-
> dependent high-frequency-diminution gradients. The less familiar a
stimulus
> set is, the steeper these gradients. Because of this, future apparatus
will
> actually be able to "read minds" :-). The apparatus will cross correlate
> stimulus information-content with such gradients, and from such will be
> able to "know" what the subject "knows". ...
couple of questions:
- where do you get the stimulus "content" data from? naive judgements about
the task?
- ditto with respect to the judgements that need to be expressed by the
apparatus?
- how do you propose solving the problem that the gradients are dynamic and
hence are not the same from one time to another (it will, of course, be
obvious that they differ completely between individuals)?
top transhuman science fiction, but i feel there are still a few
unsurpassable obstacles.
dog
|dog at dog.net.uk|http://dog.net.uk| cheeky as buggery