IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Neurobiological revisionism

Michael Kisley kisley at rintintin.Colorado.EDU
Sun Mar 27 20:24:20 EST 1994

bioaw124 at emoryu1.cc.emory.edu (Claire Maier) writes:

>You have a truly amazing talent for writing huge numbers of words
>without saying a damned thing.

>What's your point?  What does this recitation of historical trivia
>have to do with modern neuroscience or neurology?

>Please post a _real_ abstract of your paper, if that is what you
>are claiming to be doing.  It should be under 300 words.  And given
>your love of historical non sequiturs, please do not make any
>direct references to anything before 1980.  The abstract should
>justify your initial claim that an understanding of bioelectric
>forces would revolutionize the treatment of neurological disease.

I found these posts interesting and enjoyable reading, regardless of their
adherence or non-adherence to the strict definition of "abstract".  Your
post, Claire, is inflammatory and unnecessarily harsh.

Michael Kisley

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net