No, temperature and nutrition doesnt change the DNA - but it can change
the growth rate of the fingers and affect the way the genes are
expressed. If you're interested in the effects of the environment versus
the effects of the genes on an organism, well, you can join in on the
debate (: People have been arguing about it for a long time. Do a google
search for "nature versus nurture" and it will come up with a stack of
Free Spirit wrote:
> Hi Scott.
>> Thanks for your answer and the information about the websites. By the way,
> the DNA of identical twins are the same, can the temperature and nutrition
> change it?
>> Another question that sometimes occurs to me is about double-yolk eggs. If
> such an egg is hatched, does it turn out to be a attached two chicks or a
> chick with two heads?
>> Thanks for your time.
>>> in article EGbwb.24237$aT.12411 at news-server.bigpond.net.au, Scott Coutts at
>scott.coutts at med.monash.edu.au wrote on 11/23/03 6:47 PM:
>>>>Hiya Free Spirit,
>>>>The short answer is: No, they dont have the same finger prints!
>>>>They're very similar, but your finger print is not solely defined by
>>your genetics. It is mostly, but small parts of it are defined by your
>>environment. For example, the temperature and nutrition can change your
>>prints. Anyhow, here's some info about it.
>>>>http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may2001/989606823.Ge.r.html>>http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a980821.html>>>>If you do a google search for "fingerprint identical twins" then you'll
>>find more than you need on the topic (: