Bill_A_Nussbaumer at bd.com wrote:
> Despite the slightly condescending tone of the reply, Dr. Farrell is right
> that your question seems to be using terminology incorrectly and is
> probably thus confusing most "would be respondents". The other explanation
> is that you just haven't given us enough information in context to make
> sense of your question.
[snip]
Gee, and I tried so hard to make it really condescending!
--
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
Professor of Microbiology
Idaho State University
