Cloning human beings?

Colin A. B. Davidson c.davidson at biotech.cam.ac.uk
Wed Feb 7 11:28:53 EST 2001

"Janu" <janubas at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3A815446.9EA1462 at yahoo.com...
> It is certainly true, that imprecisely defined statements may cause
hysteria and
> polariasation between uninformed people. I know there are different kinds
> application concerning human cloning. However this technique still works
> living "organisms" (cells as primitive life-forms) and this is an
> point. We, humans, are very sentimental and religious when we talk about
> life, or our being. Theoretically every cell of our body could be used to
> another human being. When we clone someone (it doesn't matter how) we play
> We create what we want, we decide what should come out: skin, special
drugs or
> an entire person and so on...
> When we do it with animals, noboy cares because in our religion (western
> animals don't have a spirit. One philosopher said one day: "animals are
> living automats". Aren't we not the same?

So, would you care to rephrase your question to ;
Do you think human cloning, including that of human embryos for research
into the treatment of fatal diseases, should be allowed?

More information about the Microbio mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net