In article <20000513211202.20459.00002039 at ng-ba1.aol.com>, yjgent at aol.com
>>>>Perhaps the differences can be explained by the fact that the predominant
>>strains of HIV differ in North America and Africa? I have heard that the
>>HIV strain predominant in Africa is *much* more easily transmissable to
>>I thought that was because homosexual sex is almost unheard of in Africa while
>multiple wives and "extra marital" sex is very common. The African strains have
>been cooking along a bit longer than any others.
Maybe "unheard of" means just that, it's never mentioned. That do not have
to mean that it's nonexisting.
Another issue: if we assume HIV was transmitted from animals to people, in
Africa - why do we assume it only have happend once. Maybe what yau mention
below has added more to the epedemia than anyone like to believe.
>I also remember that a lot of these "new" viral infections showed up after the
>Ugandan dictator Idi Amin decided to build a highway through the middle of
>Uganda exposing a lot of people to "virgin" jungle and all the flora and fauna
>that have never seen a human.